With the recent backlash of Amber Rose’s visit to Ghana to mentor young girls and the outrage that follows behind Basketball Wives Draya Michele along with the many women who defend and take up for these women. I found myself pondering a few things.
Is there something wrong with being a h0e if you gets you some millions and prosperity in the end? Or Is it better to be broke with seemingly good moral characteristics? Everyone likes a person who appears to have good morals but according to the bible if you are screwing out of wedlock you don’t have good morals.
Draya may not be book smart but she has parlayed her way into fame and fortune that allowed her to launch a new bikini line. Amber Rose may not be the most intellectually smartest woman to you but she has parlayed her relationship with Kanye into a prosperous modeling career with major companies and a unlimited amount of men who want to date her.
These women stopped screwing block dudes or dudes who say, be independent, I’m not doing anything for you a long time ago.
Some women have screwed a few wealthy men and prospered from it. They either married or received fame and fortune. Some screwed wealthy men and got a slam, bam thank you mam along with a goodbye. Other women have screwed a few broke men that netted them nothing. They loved, got their heart broken and moved on.
Does that really feel good to know that you’ve screwed 20 men and you still live in poverty or would you have preferred to screw 17 men and 3 of them had been of assistance to you so that you never have to live in poverty again?
Isn’t there a difference between how Diddy made his money screwing over artists and how Amber Rose and other women found fame and fortune by being in relationships with popular men? Draya may not have gotten a dime from any of those athletes by her association with them netted her more attention.
Some women have screwed more or less than the same amount of guys.. They just screwed men that didn’t help them progress. Instead they walked away with nothing, probably not even a “orgazm”. Can you really say that you are morally better? Who is really smarter: You or Amber?
I really want to know what’s going on in the minds of young women today. So I ask..
1. Is there a point of screwing a broke man or a man who isn’t willing to financially assist you if needed?
2. If you are a woman having financial troubles shouldn’t you think that you are too broke to be intimately active? Would it be smarter and morally better if you kept your legs closed while you worked hard to get your ish together or only opened them for men who were willing to assist you in your goals and aspirations?
3. Do women really believe that they are morally better than the chick who got paid for her liaisons when they were both morally doing the same things?
4. Lastly do women feel like it’s their responsibility to date broke men because they themselves are broke?
Let me know your thoughts ladies.. I already know the men are going to say that sex is for recreation and for bonding. But they don’t understand how hard it is to bond with a broke man.